Hunting and logging are illegal in any protected areas here, but enforcement is weak at best either due to lack of funding or lack of will. Last week I was out in the forest until 10:30pm, and as my ranger and I were walking along we saw lights that weren't fireflies, they were other torches. We stopped in alarm and switched our own torches off. The other lights also disappeared. We realised they were torchlights and both us and the other group of people had turned them all off and were waiting silently about 40m away from each other waiting for the other group to make a move. I was a bit indignant at finding people in the park at night, as it could only mean they were hunting animals and clearly they shouldn't be there, but my ranger Viset was clutching his gun and agreed that there were 'people!' and suggesting 'let's go!' urgently enough that I figured we should do so. We continued on and found their campfire and that the people had run away into the forest. I reported this and the head rangers were advised by staff at the wildlife rescue centre to be more vigilant.
Then two days ago I was heading up the mountain at 6:30am with another, more experienced ranger, Mr Lan, when we began hearing the unmistakeable sound of chainsaws at work in the forest. We turned around and headed back down the path until we had mobile reception, and Mr Lan was straight on the phone telling his ranger mates to go and nab these guys. Apparently they did, although I'm always suspicious, knowing how things work in Cambodia - did the rangers go and 'arrest' the illegal loggers out of a genuine concern for the Park, or to extort bribes to line their pockets and then let the loggers go about their business, or keep their timber? Corruption is endemic and it's hard to be high-horsed about it when the rangers receive $30-40 salary per month.
Around the Lingas, the carvings where tourists visit daily, the rangers have painted symbols on lots of the trees warning local people to leave them standing...
| 'Don't cut' or a wide-legged man with a low-hanging willy? Hard to say... |
But venture further into the forest, and in places there are clearings where loggers have camped and made planks out of some of the biggest trees. In some cases they were either disturbed or decided to leave without taking everything with them...
At times I have come across an entire felled tree just left lying there, no timber taken at all. Puzzled, I asked my ranger who explained in halting English that the people like the fruit of a certain vine that grows high up in some trees. Instead of climbing to get it or knocking it down, they simply cut the whole tree down, make a lunch of the vine fruit, and be done with it.
When I first visited here last year I remember finding it odd that although you can tell that the forest is secondary - low canopy height, thick under- and mid-storey making it hard to walk through all the tangle and regenerating trees when not on a path, lack of very big trees - there are hardly any tree stumps around. Then I was shown why: most of the trees that are selected for logging are valuable for their timber, dark woods in particular for making furniture. This little Park (about 14,000 hectares) has so few of these kinds of trees left that the people now dig out the stumps and upper root systems, so you can find a lot of these characteristic holes in the forest...
On one day we came across a group of men carrying out a big stump slung beneath a pole they all carried together. My young ranger simply gave them a nod and we carried on. Definitely a case of lack of enforcement around here, but without the resources to fund it, smaller 'protected' areas like this are becoming more and more degraded every year.